PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1308 - 9501

Original article | International Journal of Educational Researchers 2012, Vol. 3(2) 1-9

The Adaptation of Perception of Parent Scale (POPS) into the Turkish Culture

Ercan Kocayörük

pp. 1 - 9   |  Manu. Number: ijers.2012.004

Published online: July 01, 2012  |   Number of Views: 193  |  Number of Download: 416


Abstract

The main goal of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Perception of Parents Scale (POPS) developed by Robbins (1994), with a sample of middle-adolescents with ages between 14 and 18 years. The confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the reliability and validity of a three-dimension model of adolescents’ perception of mother and father based on perspective of Self-Determination Theory. Results of the confirmatory factor analyses suggested the original factor structure of the POPS does not fit the data for adolescents ratings of mother and fathers on the measures. As a result of modification indices check, the relationships between the error terms of items were determined. The second confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the new three-factor model provides acceptable fit. It was concluded that the POPS constitutes a useful tool for the assessment of both parent and peer attachment in adolescent aged between 14 and 18 years

Keywords: Self determination theory, adolescents, parents.


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kocayoruk, E. (2012). The Adaptation of Perception of Parent Scale (POPS) into the Turkish Culture. International Journal of Educational Researchers , 3(2), 1-9.

Harvard
Kocayoruk, E. (2012). The Adaptation of Perception of Parent Scale (POPS) into the Turkish Culture. International Journal of Educational Researchers , 3(2), pp. 1-9.

Chicago 16th edition
Kocayoruk, Ercan (2012). "The Adaptation of Perception of Parent Scale (POPS) into the Turkish Culture". International Journal of Educational Researchers 3 (2):1-9.

References
  1. Ackard, D. M., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., & Perry, C. (2006). Parent-child connectedness and behavioral and emotional health among adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(1), 59-66. [Google Scholar]
  2. Armsden, G.C., & Greenberg, M.T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427-454. [Google Scholar]
  3. Coker, J. K., & Borders, L. D. (2001). An analysis of environmental and social factor affecting adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79, 200-208. [Google Scholar]
  4. Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 135-161). New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hindelang, R. L., Dwyer, W. O., &. Leeming, F. C. (2001). Adolescent risk-taking behavior: a review of the role of parental involvement. Curr. Probl. Pediatr, 31, 67-83. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes incovariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. StructuralEquationModeling, 6, 1-55. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kocayörük, E. (2010). A Turkish Adaptation of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: The Reliability and Validity Study. Eğitim Araştırmaları-Eurasian Journal of EducationalResearch, 40, 133-151. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lieberman, M., Doyle, A., & Markiewicz, D. (1999). Developmental patterns in security of attachment to mother and father in late childhood and early adolescence: Associations with peer relations. Child Development, 70, 202-213. [Google Scholar]
  10. Robbins, R. J. (1994). An assessment of perceptions of parental autonomy support and control: Child and parent correlates. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Rochester, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ryan, R.M., & Decı, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68-78. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sands, D. J., & Doll, B. (1996). Fostering self-determination is a developmental task. Journal of Special Education, 30, 58-76. [Google Scholar]
  13. Simons, K. J. M., Paternite, C., & Shore, C. (2001). Quality of parent/adolescent attachment and aggression in young adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 182-203. [Google Scholar]
  14. Şimşek, Ö., F. (2006). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş [Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling]. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wehman, P. (1998). Foreword. In M. L. Wehmeyer, M. Agran, & C. Hughes. (Eds.), Teaching self- determination to students with disabilities (pp. ix-xi). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. [Google Scholar]