Original article | International Journal of Educational Researchers 2021, Vol. 12(2) 1-10
pp. 1 - 10 | Manu. Number: ijers.2021.007
Published online: June 30, 2021 | Number of Views: 16 | Number of Download: 124
Educational leaders need to be able to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of educational programs, policies, and instructional activities in their schools and school systems. The experiences and perspectives of stakeholders matter in an attempt to understand the state of affairs of teaching and learning situations, programs, policies and interventions, and other activities in the schools and educational systems. The review strongly situates qualitative research as an option in evaluation research, especially in the field education. Qualitative evaluation has the potential of leading to a consultative understanding and review of school programs and situations and provide authentic basis for interventions aimed at school improvement. School leaders, especially the principals/school heads and other personnel who are part of the school leadership need to understand qualitative evaluation research, its place in education and school administration, and how it can be utilized to support school improvement efforts.
Keywords: School Improvement, School Leaders, Qualitative Research, Evaluation, Qualitative Evaluation, Methods
|How to Cite this Article?|
APA 6th edition
Chicago 16th edition
Agrawal, M. (2004). Curricular reform in schools: the importance of evaluation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(3), 361-379.
Alazzi, K. F. (2012) Social studies in the back burner in Jordanian elementary school: A phenomenological examination of social studies teachers and supervisors. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(2), 85-93.
Anastas, J. W. (2004). Quality in qualitative evaluation: Issues and possible answers. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(1), 57-65.
Bao, X. M. (1999). A Phenomenology of Teaching with Laptop Computers: A Case Study through the Eyes of a Trainer. In Hans E. Klein (Ed), Interactive Teaching & the Multi Media Revolution: Case Method and Other Techniques (pp. 43-52). Needhan (Boston), MA: The World Association for Case method Research & Case Method Application.
Bordage, G. (2009). Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Medical education, 43(4), 312-319.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Colbert, J. A., Brown, R. S., Choi, S., & Thomas, S. (2008). An investigation of the impacts of teacher-driven professional development on pedagogy and student learning. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(2), 135-154.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Crotty, M. (2012). The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Edition, E. (2013). The School Principal as Leader: Guiding Schools to Better Teaching and Learning.
Englander, M. (2012). The Interview: Data collection in descriptive phenomenological human scientific research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43, 13–35.
Fer, S. (2004). Qualitative evaluation of emotional intelligence in-service program for secondary school teachers. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 562-588.
Flood, A. (2010). Understanding phenomenology. Anne Flood looks at the theory and methods involved in phenomenological research. Nurse Researcher, 17(2), 7-15.
Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction-4/E. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.,
Greene, J. C. (1994). Qualitative program evaluation. Handbook of qualitative research, 530-544.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2, 163-194.
Kaplan, B., & Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Healthcare Information Systems, 30-55.
Leshem, S., & Trafford, V. (2007). Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 93-105.
Lynch, B. K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marlow, M. P., & McLain, B. (2011). Assessing the impacts of experiential learning on teacher classroom practice. Research in Higher Education Journal, 14, 1-15.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Milstein, B., & Wetterhall, S. (2000). A framework featuring steps and standards for program evaluation. Health Promotion Practice, 1(3), 221-228.
Muraskin, L. D. (1993). Understanding Evaluation: The Way to Better Prevention Programs. Rockville, MD: Westat Inc.
Patterson, M. E., & Williams, D. R. (2002). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: hermeneutic principles, methods, and case examples, Champaign, Illinois: Sagamore.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, inc.
Russell, C. K., & Gregory, D. M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 6, 36-40. doi: 10.1136/ebn.6.2.36
Simonson, M. R. (1997). Evaluating teaching and learning at a distance. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (71), 87-94.
Tuli, F. (2011). The basis of distinction between qualitative and quantitative research in social science: reflection on ontological, epistemological and methodological perspectives. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 6(1), 97-108.
Williamson, K. (2006). Research in constructivist frameworks using ethnographic techniques. Library trends, 55(1), 83-101.
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Yeigh, T., Lynch, D., Turner, D., Provost, S. C., Smith, R., & Willis, R. L. (2019). School leadership and school improvement: an examination of school readiness factors. School Leadership & Management, 39(5), 434-456.
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 312-325.
June 2021All Articles