PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1308 - 9501

Original article | International Journal of Educational Researchers 2020, Vol. 11(2) 30-40

Effectiveness of Spontaneous Collaboration as a form of Distributed Leadership in School Performance

Touseef Fatıma

pp. 30 - 40   |  Manu. Number: ijers.2020.004

Published online: June 29, 2020  |   Number of Views: 23  |  Number of Download: 100


Abstract

Distributed leadership involves people sharing their expertise to get greater output and is observed in any organization by spontaneous collaboration, intuitive working relations and institutionalized practice. Research has identified the role of spontaneous collaboration on multiple school performance such as rate of enrollment, rate of retention and rate of graduation. However, relatively few is known in Pakistan about role of spontaneous collaboration especially in students’ academic achievement in Mathematics. The present study examined the effectiveness of spontaneous collaboration as a form of distributed leadership in school performance. The quantitative design was found compatible as hypothesis were derived from Peter Gronn’s distributed leadership. The schools where students give their matriculation exam through Board of Secondary Education Karachi (BSEK) were population (N=9887). The 370 participants through systematic sampling were selected and responded through an adapted questionnaire that included 39-items reflecting their responses on school performance, instructional strategy and role of leadership with the consideration of Mathematics. The study explained the relationship between school performance as measured by Mathematics results in Board of Secondary Education (SSC-II) Examination and spontaneous collaboration through the computation of Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. The findings of the study indicated that positive and significant relationship found between acceptance of change and school performance. Moreover, the culture of autonomy proved to have significant relationship with school performance. However, the negative while significant relationship existed between trust in the expertise of individual and school performance. Thus, the study shed light on certain aspects of spontaneous collaboration that were found significant with the school performance.

Keywords: Distributed leadership-Spontaneous collaboration–School performance


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Fatima, T. (2020). Effectiveness of Spontaneous Collaboration as a form of Distributed Leadership in School Performance . International Journal of Educational Researchers , 11(2), 30-40.

Harvard
Fatima, T. (2020). Effectiveness of Spontaneous Collaboration as a form of Distributed Leadership in School Performance . International Journal of Educational Researchers , 11(2), pp. 30-40.

Chicago 16th edition
Fatima, Touseef (2020). "Effectiveness of Spontaneous Collaboration as a form of Distributed Leadership in School Performance ". International Journal of Educational Researchers 11 (2):30-40.

References
  1.  Al-Harthi, A. S. A., & Al-Mahdy, Y. F. H. (2017). Distributed leadership and school effectiveness in Egypt and Oman: an exploratory study. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(6), 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2016-0132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tony Bush. (2013). Instructional leadership and leadership for learning: global and South African perspectives, EducationasChange, 17(1), S5-S20.https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2014.865986 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. CheckMarket. (2019). Sample size calculator. https://www.checkmarket.com/sample-size-calculator/ [Google Scholar]
  5. Clifford, Ellen Behrstock-Sherrat, & Jenni Fetters. (2012). The ripple effect: A synthesis of research on principal influence to inform performance evaluation design. American Institute for Research. [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, M. W. (2009). Distributed Leadership and School Performance. ProQuestLLC. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fabelo, T. T. (2011). Breaking Schools’ Rules: A statewide study of how school disciplinerelates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. Council of State Governments Justice Center. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gay, L. (1996). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. Englewood Cliffs. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly . [Google Scholar]
  10. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sadruddin Bahadur Qutoshi & Jan-e-Alam Khaki. (2014). The role of a principal / headteacher in school improvement: A case study of a community-based school in Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 8 (2), 86-96. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kenneth Leithwood, Christopher Day, Pam Sammons, Alma Harris & David Hopkins. (2006a). Successful school leadership: what it is and how it influences pupil learning. DfES Publications [Google Scholar]
  13. Yan Liu &Mehmet Şükrü Bellibaş. (2018). The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of. school climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education . 21(2), 226-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1147608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Muhammad Niqab, Sailesh Sharma, Leong Mei Wei & Shafinaz Bt A. Maulod.(2014). Instructional leadership potential among school principals in pakistan. International Education Studies, 7 (6), 74-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n6p74 [Google Scholar]
  15. Christine M. Neumerski. (2012). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and whereshould we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly ,49(2) 310-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12456700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Pakistan, M. o. (2017). National Education Policy. National Education Policy 2017-2025 . Islamabad. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hassanreza Zeinabadi & Hassan Rastegarpour. (2010). Factors affecting teacher trust in principals: Testing the effect of transformational leadership and procedural justice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences , 5(2010)1004–1008. [Google Scholar]
  18. Salfi, N. (2011). Successful leadership practices of head teachers for school improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 49 (4), 414-432. [Google Scholar]
  19. Skiba, R. &. (2006). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. In C. E. Weinstein, Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  20. Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  21. Spillane, J. (2007a). Distributed Leadership in Practice. Teachers College Press . [Google Scholar]