PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1308 - 9501

International Journal of Educational Researchers 2015, Vol. 6(3) 15-33

Vocabulary Learning Strategy Preferences and Vocabulary Size of Pre-service English Teachers

Sabriye Şener

pp. 15 - 33   |  Manu. Number: ijers.2015.010

Published online: December 01, 2015  |   Number of Views: 381  |  Number of Download: 535


Abstract

The present study examined the vocabulary learning strategy preferences and vocabulary size of pre-service English teachers at a state university in Turkey. It also investigated the relationship between their strategy use and vocabulary size. To this end, 304 pre-service teachers constituted the working group of the research. In this study, a quantitative research design was employed. For data collection, an adapted version of the Vocabulary Learning Strategy Inventory and Vocabulary Levels Test were used. The most frequently used vocabulary learning strategy sub-group was found to be determination and the lowest vocabulary learning strategy subgroup was cognitive. Besides, the most significant relationship was seen between the vocabulary size and cognitive strategies. Finally, multiple comparison tests revealed a significant statistical difference between the first and fourth graders’ vocabulary size.

Keywords: Word level, vocabulary learning strategies, vocabulary size


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Sener, S. (2015). Vocabulary Learning Strategy Preferences and Vocabulary Size of Pre-service English Teachers. International Journal of Educational Researchers , 6(3), 15-33.

Harvard
Sener, S. (2015). Vocabulary Learning Strategy Preferences and Vocabulary Size of Pre-service English Teachers. International Journal of Educational Researchers , 6(3), pp. 15-33.

Chicago 16th edition
Sener, Sabriye (2015). "Vocabulary Learning Strategy Preferences and Vocabulary Size of Pre-service English Teachers". International Journal of Educational Researchers 6 (3):15-33.

References
  1. Aktekin, N. Ç., and Güven, S.(2013). Examining the impact of vocabulary strategy training on adult EFL students. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp.339-352. [Google Scholar]
  2. Askar, W.A.(2013). A survey on the use of vocabulary learnıng strategıes by ELT and ELL students of Duhok University in Northern Iraq. Unpublished MA Thesis, Near East University, Graduate School of Education Sciences, Nicosia. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baharudin, H. and Zawawi, I. (2014). Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Arabic Vocabulary Size among Pre-University Students in Malaysia. International Education Studies, Vol. 7, No. 13, 219-226. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, D. (2002). Strategies for Success: A Practical Guide to Learning English. New York: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, A. D. (1999). Strategies in Learning and Using Second Language. Malaysia: Longman. [Google Scholar]
  6. Erten, İ. H. (1998). Vocabulary Learning Strategies: An Investigation into the Effect of Perceptual Learning Styles and Modality of Word Presentation on the Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Exeter: The University of Exeter [Google Scholar]
  7. Erten, İ. H. (2000). “Vocabulary Learning Strategies: An Attempt to Develop Taxonomy.” (19 - 20 Oct 2000. 4. International INGED Çukurova ELT Conference. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gorevannova, A.(2000). The Relationship between Students’ Perceptual Learning Style Preferences, Language Learning Strategies and English Vocabulary Size. Unpublished M.A Thesis. Ankara: Bilkent University. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gu, Y., and Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning 46 (4), 643 - 79. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hatch, E. and Brown, C. (1998). Vocabulary, Semantics, and Language Education. U.S.A: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hedge, T. (2001). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. King, G. (2000). Collins Word power. Glasgow: Caledonian International Book Manufacturing Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis, M. (1994). The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward. London: Commercial Colour Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mackey, A., and Gas, S.M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. U.S.A: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nation, I. S. P. (2002). “Measuring Learner’s Present Level of Vocabulary Knowledge.” (Workshop paper received by personal communication). [Google Scholar]
  18. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. U.S.A: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  19. Özdamar, K. (2002). Paket Programlar İleri Veri Analizi 1 SPSS- MINITAB. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi. [Google Scholar]
  20. Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Richards, J. C. and Renandya, W. A. (2002). (Eds.) Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. U.S.A: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sanaovi, R. (1995). Adult learners' approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. The Modern Language Journal. 79, (1), 15-28. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. U.S.A: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schmitt, N., and Mccarty, M. (2001). Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Schmitt, N., Bird, R., Tseng, A. C., and T-C Yang, T. C.(1997). Vocabulary learning strategies: Student perspectives and cultural considerations. U.S.A: Independence. [Google Scholar]
  26. Şener, S. (2003). The Relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size of the ELT Students. The Second International ELT Conference “Languages for Life”. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 22-25 May, Çanakkale, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  27. Singleton, D. (1999). Exploring the second language mental lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tanyer, S. and Öztürk, Y. (2014). Pre-service English teachers’ vocabulary learning strategy use and vocabulary size: : A Cross- sectional Evaluation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 37-45. [Google Scholar]
  29. Thornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Malaysia: Longman - Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ur, P. (2002). A Course in language teaching: Practice and Theory.GB: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Williams, M., and Burden, R. L.(1999). Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zimmerman, C. B. (1998). “Historical Trends in Second Language Vocabulary Instruction” J. Coady and T. Huckin (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition U.S.A: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]