Early Childhood Development And Education Through Nature-Child Interactions: A Conceptual Paper
İbrahim H. Acar
pp. 1-10 | MID: ijers.2013.006
Manuscript Views: 53 | Manuscript Download: 32
The present paper addresses following research questions:
RQ1: How does nature or nature-based activities help children’s cognitive development?
RQ2: How does nature or nature-based activities help children’s social and prosocial behavior development?
RQ3: How does nature or nature-based activities enhance children’s learning abilities?
To address these research questions, this paper will explore how nature helps young children’s cognitive, social, prosocial behavior development through primary and secondary existing literature sources (Fraenkel, Wallen, & Hyun, 2012). This paper will also touch on how teachers influence children’s learning objectives through guiding children’s learning activities during nature-based activities. The present paper tends to explore child development through peer-child and child-teacher interactions throughout nature-based activities through the lens of Vygotsky’s (1978) Socio-Cultural Theory.
Keywords: Nature and Child, Child Development, Early Childhood Education
- Acar, I. H., & Torquati, J. (2012, November). Prosocial Behavior Exhibited in Preschool-aged Children through Nature-based Activities. Paper session presented at the annual meeting of Midwestern Educational Research Association, Evanston, IL.
- Allen, J. B., & Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental Locus of Control, Sympathy, and Proenvironmental Behavior. Environment & Behavior, 31(3), 338-353.
- Bailie, P. E. (2012). Connecting children to nature: A multiple case study of nature center Preschools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln). Retrieved from
- Brown, S. (2009). Play: How It Shapes the brain, Opens the Imagination, and Ingvigorates the Soul. New York , NY: Penguin Group.
- Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11-21.
- Cimprich, B. E. (1990). Attentional fatigue and restoration in individuals with cancer. Unpub-lished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
- Cheng, J. C.-H., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children's affective attitude toward nature . Environment and Behavior, 44, 31-49. doi:10.1177/0013916510385082.
- Cohen, S. (2001). Social Relationships and Susceptibility to the Common Cold. In C. D. Ryff, & B. H. Singer, Emotion, Social Relationships, and Health (pp. 221-242). New York, NY: Oxford University Press .
- Coley, R., & Kuo, F. E. (1997). Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment & Behavior, 29(4), 468.
- Coplan, R. J., & Arbeau, K. A. (2009). Peer Interactions and Play in Early Childhood. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen, Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups (pp. 143-161). New York, NY: The Guilford Press .
- Curtis, D., & Carter, M. (2005). Rethinking early childhood environments to enhance leaming . Young Children, 60(3), 34-46.
- Dobbs-Oates, J., Kaderavek, J. N., & Justice, L. M. (2011). Effective behavior management in preschool classrooms and children’s task orientation: Enhancing emergent literacy and language development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 420- 429. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.02.003.
- Downer, J. T., Booren, L. M., Lima, O. K., Luckner, A. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). The Individualized Classroom Assessment Scoring System (inCLASS): Preliminary reliability and validity of a system for observing preschoolers' competence in classroom interaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25 (1), 1-16.
- Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial Development. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 6th ed., pp. 646-718). New York: Wiley.
- Faber Taylor, A. & Kuo, F. E. (2006). Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? State of the evidence. In C. Spencer & M. Blades, (Eds.), Children and their environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 124-140.
- Faber Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F., Sullivan, W. (2001) Coping with ADD: The Surprising Connection to Green Play Settings. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 54.
- Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th editon). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
- Grahn, P., Mârtensson, F., Lindblad, B., Nilsson,P., & Ekman, A. (1997). Ute pâ dagis [Outdoors at daycare]. Stad och Land [City and country], No. 145. Hâssleholm, Sweden: Norra Skâne Offset.
- Gopnik, A. (2009). The Philosophical Baby: What Children's Minds Tell Us about Truth, Love, and the Meaning of Life. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux .
- Hânnikâinen, M., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2010). Promoting children’s participation: the role of teachers in preschool and primary school learning sessions. Early Years, 30(2), 147-160. doi:
- Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
- Hillman, M., Adams, J., & Whitelegg, J. (1990). One false move: A study of children's independent mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute .
- Hovland, M. R., Gapp, S. C., & Theis, B. L. (2011). Look: Examining the concept of learning to at print . Reading Improvement, 48(3), 128-138.
- Howes, C., & Ritchie, S. (2002). A Matter of Trust: Connecting Teachers and Learners in the Early Childhood Classroom . New York, NY: Teachers College Press .
- Kahn, P. H., Jr. (1999). The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Kahn, Jr., P. H. (2002). Children’s affiliations with nature: Structure, development, and the problem of environmental generational amnesia. In P.H. Kahn, Jr. and S.R.
- Kellert (Eds.), 2002, Children and Nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. (pp. 93-116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Kaplan, R. (1973). Some psychological benefits of gardening. Environment and Behavior, 5 (2), 145-162.
- Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In E.O. Wilson & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), 1993, The biophilia hypothesis. (pp. 31-41). Washington DC: Island Press.
- Kellert, S. R. (2005). Building for Life: Designing and Understanding the Human-Nature Connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.
- Kozulin, A. (1987). The concepts of activity in Soviet psychology: Vygotsky, his disciples, and critics. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An Introduction Vygotsky. (pp. 101-125). New York: Routledge.
- Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., & Sullivan, W.C. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30, 28-59.
- Lee, Y., Kinzie, M. B., & Whittaker, J. V. (2012). Impact of online support for teachers’ open-ended questioning in pre-k science activities. Teaching & Teacher Education, 28(4), 568-577. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.002.
- Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
- Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., . . . Early, D. M. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732-749. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-
- Milteer, R. M., & Ginsburg, K. R. (2011). The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy Child Development abd Maintaining Strong Parent-Child Bond: Focus on Children in Poverty. Pediatrics, 204-213.
- Mussen, P., & Eisenber-Berg, N. (1977). Roots of Caring, Sharing, and Helping. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company .
- Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing Relationships between Children and Teachers . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
- Poresky, R. H. (1990). The young children's empathy measure: Reliability, validity, and effects of companion animal bonding. Psychological Reports, 66, 931-936.
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology,43 (4), 1045-1050. doi:10.1037/0012-
- Schultz, W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P.
- Schumck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61-78). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
- Spivak, A. L., & Howes, C. (2011). Social and Relational Factors in Early Education and Prosocial Actions of Children of Diverse Ethnocultural Communities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57(1), 1-24.
- Tarim, K. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning on preschoolers’ mathematics problem-solving ability. Educational Studies In Mathematics, 72(3), 325-340. doi:10.1007/s10649-009-9197-x.
- Taylor, A.F.,Wiley, A.,Kuo,F. E.,& Sullivan,W. C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior, 30, 3-27.
- Thompson, C. W., Aspinall, P. & Montarzino, A. (2008). The childhood factor: Adult visits to green places and the significance of childhood experience. Environment and Behavior, 40(1), 111-143.
- Trawick-Smith, J., & Dziurgot, T. (2011). ‘Good-fit’ teacher-child play interactions and the subsequent autonomous play of preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 110-123.
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Weinstein, C. S., & David, T. G. (1987). Spaces for Children : The Built Environment and Child Development. New York: Plenum Press.
- Wells, N. (2000). At home with nature: effects of "greenness" on children's cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775-795.
- Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Zucker, T. A., Justice, L. M., Piasta, S. B., & Kadaravek, J. N. (2010). Preschool teachers’ literal and inferential questions and children's responses during whole-class shared reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(1), pp. 65-83.doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.07.001.
The Effect Of Jigsaw-I Cooperative Learning Technique On Students’ Understanding About Basic Organic Chemistry Concepts
Gülşen ÇAĞATAY & Gökhan DEMİRCİOĞLU
pp. 30-37 | MID: ijers.2013.008
Manuscript Views: 138 | Manuscript Download: 697
The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of Jigsaw-1 Cooperative Learning technique on students’ understanding and alternative conceptions concerning basic organic chemistry concepts. The study was conducted with a total of 52 9th grade students in a high school in Trabzon. The study used quasi-experimental design (an experimental group and a control group). While experimental group students performed activities based on Jigsaw 1 technique, control group students were taught with traditional approach. The treatment lasted for three lesson hours in both groups. An Organic Chemistry Achievement Test involving 5 open-ended questions was used to collect data. The data obtained from pre- and post-tests of both groups was compared with the independent t-test. The post-test results showed that there was a significant difference between groups in favor of the experimental group. In other words, the experimental group students taught with Jigsaw I technique performed better in the post-test than the control group.
- Aydın, S. (2011). Effect of cooperative learning and traditional methods on students’ achievements and identifications of laboratory equipments in science-technology laboratory course, Educational Research and Reviews, 6(9), 636-644.
- Bowen, C. W. (2000). A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 116-119.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:awrence Earlbaum Associates
- Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R.K. (2007). Enhancing pre-service primaryteachers’ conceptual understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. International Journal of Science Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1-28.
- Demircioğlu, G.. Özmen, H. and Ayas,A.(2004).Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice . 73-80
- Doymuş, K., (2008). Teaching Chemical Equilibrium with the Jigsaw Technique. Research in Science Education, 38: 249-260
- Doymuş, K., Karaçöp, A., and Şimşek, Ü.(2010).Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students’understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry, Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 671-691
- Ebenezer, J.V. & Erickson, L.G. (1996). Chemistry students’ conception of solubility: A phenomenograpy. Science Education, 80(2), 181-201.
- Ghaith,G. And A.R. Bouzeineddine(2003).Relationship between reading attitudes, achievement and learners’
- perceptions of their Jigsaw II Cooperative learning experiences,Reading Psychool,24(1):105-12
- Haidar, A.H., & Abraham, M.R. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 919-938
- Haller, R.C ., Gallagher, V.J ., Weldon,T.L., Felder, R.M., 2000. Dynamics of peer interactions in cooperative learning. Journal Engineering Education, 89(3), 285-293
- Johnson.,B.&Christensen,L.(2004) Educational Research,Quantitative,Qualitative and mixed Approaches, second edition,Pearson,U.S.A
- Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T., and Smith, Karl A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
- Kozma, R.B., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry instruction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105 ± 143.
- Mattingly,R.M and R.L,Van Sickle (1991).Cooperative Learning and achievement in social studies:Jigsaw II.Social Psychol.,128(1):345-352
- Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1991). Students’ alternative frameworks and science education ,Bibliography. Kiel, Germany : Institute for Science Education
- Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering c Education, 93(3), 223-231.
- Robson, C.(1998) Real Word Research, Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Oxford, UK
- Sharan, S. (2002). Differentiating methods of cooperative learning in research and practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 106 - 116.
- Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.
- Staver, J.R. & Lumpe, A.T. (1995). Two investigations of students understanding of the mole concept and its use in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2),177-193.
- Şahin, A. (2010). Effects of jigsaw II technique on academic achievement and attitudes to written expression course, Educational Research and Reviews, 5(12), 777-787